What will always make A Creationist Look Stupid Part10
Dodany: Feb 10, 2010
Od: jkeaty2
Czas: 2:19
Straw Men Arguments In Response To: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrYl4rDsNzA
Kanał: Nonprofit
Tagi: what makes creationists stupid pt10 brief bible blunders atheists satanists evolution fundamental pseudo scientific religious extremists moses pharaoh cattle beasts christ god jesus satan devil evil twisting verses quoting judas peter thomas plagues egypt exodus genesis crucified morning evening night contradiction pegan gentile creationism
Wyświetlenia: 1320 Komentarze: 26
EvoBiologist Wypowiedź:
Feb 10, 2010 - I don't believe that God exists. AND I believe that God doesn't exist. Either way, I'm still agnostic. I don't claim to KNOW that God doesn't exist. It is true, though, that to LACK belief in something is a different and easier to defend position than to HAVE belief in something - in the second case, evidence is required to make a convincing argument, while in the first case, it isn't.
KasparHauser4 Wypowiedź:
Feb 10, 2010 - The definition of the word to know in any dictionary does not include the definition of knowing something with a supernatural degree of certainty. The clergy has fabricated a meaning of the word to know that does not appear in any other human discussions we have. The supernatural certainty definition of the word to know is only brought up as a defense against the existence of god. Human being cannot "know" things in the sense of a supernatural degree of certainty.
Katalyzt Wypowiedź:
Feb 10, 2010 - ★★★★★
Neutrinoghost Wypowiedź:
Feb 10, 2010 - I know this is an arrogant comment, but I seriously believe that I KNOW god does not exist. Call me an extreme Athiest. I studied Astrophysics to Masters Degree level and the evidence is so poor in favour of religion, I would bet my life on it.
jkeaty2 Wypowiedź:
Feb 10, 2010 - and I wouold say the same, as far as the god of the bible, as logically this thing cannot possibly exist in reality. However, I would be mistaken to believe that there is absolutely no possibility that a higher intelligence is not out there, possibly having something to do with our origins. However, abiogenesis experiments prove that it can happen naturally. but I digress.
FiverBeyond Wypowiedź:
Oct 16, 2010 - I would disagree with you from a philosophical perspective: there is no way to have knowledge of a negative. Yes, this means that you can't know that there are no unicorns, or know that you aren't sucking milk up your nose every second without knowing it. God is especially easy to sneak in. Suppose God exists, but does absolutely nothing (and has never done anything) but sit silently in the middle of the Andromeda Galaxy. How do you know he's not there?
Neutrinoghost Wypowiedź:
Oct 16, 2010 - I agree. I know it's wrong to make absolute statements which is why I could never class myself as a Gnostic atheist. The God of the bible, Qur'an, Torah, Vedas, and the Sutras however are quite obviously a load of BS. Does ANY God exist? I wont say no, but I find it really hard to say yes. Even if a God is responsible for our Universe, you still have the age old question "Who made that Gods, God? There must be one.
AgentTheGreat Wypowiedź:
Dec 12, 2010 - The idea of a supernatural god creating our world breaks so many logical rules that you don't need to go out there looking for evidence of its existence. It's not just that we have no evidence to support god; the fact is a god under the circumstances where time and space don't exist can't possibly be intelligent, and that *can* be proven by pure logic.
jkeaty2 Wypowiedź:
Dec 13, 2010 - I would tend to agree under those circumstances. However, the argument that they are putting forward is that we are supposedly saying that there definitely IS NO GOD, which is patently false. We do say that the evidence that has been presented is dubious at best, and the god that is outside of space/time as they are trying to purport (after moving the goalpost) is completely illogical, therefore bullshit
AgentTheGreat Wypowiedź:
Dec 18, 2010 - @jkeaty2 We certainly can never be 100% sure of anything. That's what science teaches us; but if you throw out all the garbage "arguments for God", God becomes merely a science-fiction story, like any other. It becomes merely a tale formed in someone's imagination, and loses its current status. Why would we care what someone who believes in Thor or the Flying Spaghetti Monster says? It's not even talked about. We simply say "the Flying Spaghetti Monster can't exist just because you say so."->
jkeaty2 Wypowiedź:
Dec 19, 2010 - Very good point, and I agree. However to remain as open as humanly possible on the subject I tend to follow the scientific position of a 99.99% probability of no god, and pretty much a 100% probability of no Christian god.
MrMZaccone Wypowiedź:
Dec 23, 2010 - There probably is no god. Feel better now?
NUTCASE71733 Wypowiedź:
Jun 8, 2011 - @bozz43 Source for so-called petrified fruits and vegetables. Provide source and link to information, prefferibly from a peer-reviewed source.
NUTCASE71733 Wypowiedź:
Jun 9, 2011 - @bozz43 I asked a simple request of you. You make a claim, you must provide evidence of that claim. Prove you're right and give everyone acsess to the site or peer-reviewd publication you got this from. Please note that if you got this from Answers in Genesis, you automatically lose.
stevehayes13 Wypowiedź:
Jul 1, 2011 - And no matter how many times this is explained to them, they will continue to engage in the practice. Why? Because it is impossible to honestly argue their position.
HimesInu Wypowiedź:
Jul 3, 2011 - A masters degree in astrophysics is enough for me.
MSPEL Wypowiedź:
Jul 31, 2011 - I'm afraid you are wrong on this one. many atheists do believe that There is no god. This is called strong atheism. Others will say I don't believe in God. This is weak atheism and is pretty close to Agnosticism. Agnosticism has a strong and weak form as well. Strong atheism does, in my opinion, commit the fallacy of making conclusions about the nearly infinite universe by people who have an admittedly limited amount of knowledge.
jkeaty2 Wypowiedź:
Aug 1, 2011 - What you fail at, is listening,. Belief is belief, knowledge is knowledge. Gnost = Knowledge. The is belief in a deity. If you made it past the eighth grade you would be able to understand this. Oooops did I use my out loud voice?
jkeaty2 Wypowiedź:
Aug 1, 2011 - So please do not use the layman's use of the words, and stick with the actual definitions. If we stick to one definition, then we can actually stop talking in circles!
22912129113 Wypowiedź:
Oct 11, 2011 - Every religion has a good god, a natural supreme power and other serious shit - let's take Judaism for example, where the hell were their god when they got put in the ovens? As long as natural disasters, ethnic exterminations happen I will not dedicate one second in believing in a god.
8698gil Wypowiedź:
Nov 8, 2011 - I must agree. I also just know god does not exist, I've known that since I was a child. I don't understand how any rational person over the age of 10 can take it seriously. I was raised in a christian home but started questioning it when I was 8 or so. Then I learned about dinosaurs, the solar system and age of the stars, and human evolution, and that totally sealed the deal for me, I was probably 11 or 12 when I was atheist all the way.
dancingnancy09 Wypowiedź:
Dec 2, 2011 - thats absolutely right- it doesnt matter whether you believe in god or whether you believe that there is no god- the only thing either side KNOWS for CERTAIN is that we just dont know for CERTAIN whether god exists or not-youre right, your friend mspel up there is not too skilled at listening
sushiyama1 Wypowiedź:
Feb 10, 2010 - Good video ; )